Name discrepancies and review queue命名差异与待核对

This page turns the cached name-matching results between this checklist and three external authorities — GBIF Backbone, Catalogue of Life (ChecklistBank) and the Blattodea Species File (BSF) — into a filterable list. Only entries that need human attention are shown: 328 rows covering 216 species/subspecies out of 3089 checklist records. Each name conflict is also resolved into one pair with a relation and a direction (pairs with relation and direction): 1 synonym pairs vs 7 combination differences; the receiving name is the external one in 1 pairs, ours in 6, and undecided in 1. 0 pair(s) have already been written into the junior-synonym section of the accepted name's species page. Nothing here changes the checklist data; matching rules are documented on the data page.

Each discrepancy as one pair: relation and direction 名称差异逐对归并：关系与方向

The 10 name-conflict rows become 8 pairs of “our name ↔ the accepted name the external database claims” (the same pair reported by several databases counts once). Two things are decided per pair: the relation — a different epithet is a synonym (1 pairs), while the same species under a different genus is a combination difference (7 pairs) — and the direction — the receiving name is the external name in 1 pairs, our name in 6 pairs, and undecided in 1 pairs. The “database verdicts” column shows each database's species-level verdict on our name (higher-rank-only, fuzzy and not-found results do not vote).

Rules: only species-level verdicts vote (genus/family-only matches, fuzzy matches and “not found” do not). A synonym means a different epithet — a genuinely different name; a combination difference means the same species under a different genus, which is not a synonym. In the latter case GBIF often sinks the genus used here into an older one and reports our name as its “accepted name”, so the direction is easily reversed — hence the direction is decided by the database votes. Only pairs that are “true synonym + externally receiving name + at least two taxonomic databases agreeing” are recordable (a contrary GBIF verdict is shown as “databases disagree” and does not veto): 0 pair(s) have been written into the accepted name's species page under “Synonyms recorded from external authorities” in its junior-synonym section (front-matter fields authority_synonym_*, also searchable). Everything else — including combination differences and undecided directions — remains a review note; no name is deleted here, and a formal merge still follows the original literature and the classification used here.

Download the full list as CSV (328 rows) · per-pair relation/direction table (8 rows) · machine-readable copy: https://termite-extant-isoptera.org/data/name-issues.json

Cache dates: GBIF / Catalogue of Life 2026-10-31; Blattodea Species File 2026-10-31. Rows marked auto-matched have not been checked by a human (0 of 3089 verified). This page, including the relation/direction table and the recording status, is generated from repository caches by .github/workflows/build_name_issues.py and is rebuilt whenever the checklist is updated; the external records shown are whatever those databases currently report.